Jesse
Livermore Lesson Two
Do not depend your analysis solely on insider
information. Jesse
Livermore learned this lesson the hard
way twice in all. The first lesson
was moderately costly; the second lesson
was to cost him his entire fortune:
Livermore
had always been skeptical about the dependability
on insider information. After
all, why would top management tell outsiders
that he was selling shares in his own
company because he thinks business will
be bad going forward (these were the days
before insider-trading was made illegal)?
Telling outsiders would only add more
selling pressure to the stock, and vice-versa.
The legendary trader, Bernard Baruch,
had always maintained that insider information
was useless, and that a person was doing
him a favor if he would keep the insider
information to himself and not reveal
it to him. Livermore got his first real
lesson sometime after he closed out his
profitable short position in Union Pacific
right before the 1906 San Francisco Earthquake.
After three days of tape-watching, he
concluded that the shares of Union Pacific
were being accumulated. He started to
accumulate shares in Union Pacific as
well only to be stopped by Ed Hutton,
the great New York financier and owner
of the E.F. Hutton brokerage house, and
a personal friend. Hutton told Livermore
that he had inside information and that
the insiders have set up a pool and were
dumping shares to him at a furious rate.
Sooner or later, Union Pacific is going
to tank. Despite his own beliefs and the
reinforcements of all those beliefs from
years of tape-watching, Livermore liquidated
his 5,000 shares of Union Pacific at $162
making only $10,000 in the process.
The next day, the company announced a
10% dividend and the shares shot up by
an additional ten points. The opportunity
cost? $50,000 in additional profits which
would be equivalent to over one million
dollars today. Livermore did not get upset
or emotional, but after this incident,
he swore that he will never listen to
insider information again and that he
will only trust his tape-watching skills
and instincts from now on.
The second lesson that was handed down
to Livermore did not strictly involve
insider information, although it was pretty
darn close to it. It also taught Livermore
a little about himself his gullibility
and his succumbing to another man's sale
skills even though he practically knew
all the facts of a product (in this case,
it was the cotton industry). Let me clarify.
This happened soon after the Panic of
1907 when Livermore was trading
successfully at a peak level and soon
after he made a small fortune by nearly
cornering the cotton market. Some weeks
before, a man named Percy Thomas (who
was also know as the Cotton King)
had gone bankrupt in trying to corner
the Cotton market, and hearing Livermore's
exploits, Thomas would seek him out and
ask Livermore to be his partner. Livermore
refused to be Thomas' partner since he
had always played a lone hand. However,
Thomas was a man of knowledge (particularly
in the cotton market, of course
where he supposedly had spies
that would report crop conditions and
the like to him as soon as they could)
and a great charmer, and Livermore was
soon put under his spell. Prior to Livermore
meeting Thomas, Livermore was short cotton.
After a month of listening to Thomas and
falling under his spell, Livermore covered
his short position and went long. This
was the beginning of Livermore's downfall.
With his judgment clouded, Livermore continued
to average down on his long position even
as Cotton fell. He even sold out his profitable
wheat position in order to maintain his
margin requirements in cotton and to even
buy more cotton on the way down. After
realizing what had happened, Livermore
soon sold out with a stake of only
$300,000 left 10% of what he had
only some months ago. Livermore sold his
apartment and his yacht and tried to recoup
his losses in the stock market. By this
time, however, his emotions were running
wild and his trading skills were shot.
Soon thereafter, Livermore was broke once
again not only losing his remaining
stake of $300,000 but now, he was
in debt to the tune of over one million
dollars. Livermore would ultimately establish
himself once again, but this lesson further
reinforced his beliefs that he should
always play a lone hand, and that he should
never tell anyone what he was doing or
ask otherwise.
Jesse
Livermore Lesson Three
The need to continuously evolve in the
stock market. This was initially discussed
in lesson one, but I believe this theme
is important enough to warrant its own
bullet point (no pun intended). In fact,
this is probably the most important lesson
that could be taught from Jesse Livermore's
experience. The most popular rules such
as cutting your losses and
don't put all your eggs in one basket
have often been cited, but what if one
wants to be able to make money in the
stock market over the long run? To this
I say: One needs to continuously
evolve in the stock market to survive
and to flourish. This is definitely
applicable to everyday life and one's
career (if one is not a trader or investor)
as well.
Jesse
Livermore has been able to successfully
trade the stock and commodity markets
over a period of more than thirty years
not only because of his intelligence,
cool-headedness, trading skills, and his
far-sightedness. He was able to do this
successfully for such a long period of
time primarily because he was able to
evolve. He adopted a more long-term, buy-and-hold-like
strategy when he shifted his trading from
the bucket shops to the New York Stock
Exchange. He was also eager to learn something
new everyday. He was also flexible
whether on the long or short side or just
being in cash. He figured out when there
were opportunities in the stock market,
and figured out what strategy to adopt
and when there were not. He also made
friends with very successful people
whether they were businesspeople or great
financiers.
This
is actually the heart of this commentary:
the need to continuously evolve. In his
ground-breaking work Common Stocks
and Uncommon Profits, originally
published in 1958, Philip A Fisher remarked
that times have changed and that the way
to make the most money over the long-run
is to find great stocks and hold them
for the long-run through thick and thin.
The old way of speculating and making
money by catching the inflection points
of boom and bust cycles was gone with
the advent of the Federal Reserve and
the maturing of the SEC and the new regulations.
I believe Jesse Livermore failed to see
that. By the end of 1929, he had successfully
maneuvered his way out of the Great Crash
with a cash horde of over $100 million
becoming of the richest men in
America. When Franklin Roosevelt came
into office in 1932 taking his
brain-trust with him
and with the creation of the SEC in 1934,
the stock and commodity markets adopted
a different character a character
which Livermore had never seen in his
entire life and a character which America
had never seen before either. There is
no documented history of the trades that
Livermore during that time all
we knew is that he went bankrupt for the
final time in his life during the 1930s
and was never able to successfully make
a comeback. Some say he lost his fortune
going long sugar futures before FDR put
a ceiling on the sugar price. Some say
he lost his fortune going long after the
crash and didn't get out in time
thinking that the 1929 dip
would be one of the many similar busts
that America had endured during the 19th
century and the early parts of the 20th
century before the creation of the Federal
Reserve. The message is clear, however.
The character of the market changed in
a big way, and Livermore was not flexible
enough to go along for the ride
despite the fact that he had successfully
evolved his strategies and trading styles
many times before in the past.
This
is not unsimilar to the period immediately
before the technology bubble burst in
the spring of 2000. At the time, I stated
that the technical indicators that were
so successful in the late 1990s would
not work anymore primarily because
that we were entering a secular bear market.
Few believed me at the time. They continued
to use their oversold technical indicators,
buying technology stocks during the many
dips along the way. They failed to evolve.
Warren Buffett had mentioned in the past
that only when the tide turns would it
be obvious to see who was swimming naked.
The
idea of evolution in the stock market
continues to hold true today. In fact,
with the advent of globalization and information
technology, it is now even more imperative
to evolve since trends can change much
more quickly. Information is now instantaneous.
Investors will need to be more nimble.
Whereas Philip Fisher emphasized that
timing was not too essential in the purchase
of stocks in 1958, this has all changed
today. Witness the meteoric rise and fall
of Taser all in a short time span
of 12 months! Also witness the huge amount
of cash that has been sitting on the balance
sheet of Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway
over the last 24 months. Yes, the company
has grown bigger, but as a percentage
of total net worth, the amount of cash
that Warren Buffett is currently holding
is unprecedented. Ten years ago, Buffett
would have been able to find opportunities
to put this cash to work. Buffett had
always been a great timer in the stock
market (he had always had the great ability
to evolve), and I believe he will be putting
all his cash to work once he finds the
best time to buy equities, bonds or whole
companies. In a weird way, Livermore's
trading/timing strategies may have been
revived. The point is: Today, the timing
of the stock market and individual stocks
is all the more essential. And MarketThoughts.com
is here to help. While the analyses of
individual stocks and industries continues
to be important today (and sites such
as the Motley Fool does a good job of
it), we also believe that the ability
to time the stock market on at least the
intermediate-term basis (and the ability
to adapt to a different style of trading
and to recognize which asset class to
buy) is going to become more essential
down the road. Through our twice-a-week
commentaries and our DJIA Timing System,
we will seek to complement our analyses
of businesses, individual stocks and industries,
with our proprietary technical indicators
and our timing skills in the stock market.
:::
Part 1 of Jesse Livermore Article
:::
more articles by Henry To
:::
more Investment Articles
|